Certussrx.com

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date

Was this IOP good to you?

  • YES

    Votes: 59 83.1%
  • NO

    Votes: 12 16.9%

  • Total voters
    71
Placed an order with A today for delivery tomorrow. We'll see how it goes. I'll post.
Yes, please keep us updated! Also, did you make sure to mention that you wanted the "Saturday delivery" option with next day air service? Because it ends up costing a few dollars more, for one... and two, if you just mentioned next day air, if the vendor sends it out as such, you will most likely not end up receiving until Monday morning. So def be in touch!

Have a great night everyone!

 
No, I paid for and told her I needed it Saturday. She sent an email saying that she will mail it today and I will get it tomorrow but my money hasn't been pick up from WU yet but I'm trying not to worry.

 
No, I paid for and told her I needed it Saturday. She sent an email saying that she will mail it today and I will get it tomorrow but my money hasn't been pick up from WU yet but I'm trying not to worry.
Ya, no need to worry! Your money will get picked up and you'll get a UPS MC notice soon I'm sure! Try to keep it off your mind and I'm sure it will go smoothly for you!

Hang in there and have a good night!

 
Mike511 said:
Yup mine were definitley bunk. I emailed her and she insists that her source is good. She offfered me free shipping and extra meds on next order. Not to happy right now.
Unfortunately, I don't think we're going to arrive at a definitive conclusion on this particular issue. I placed another partial order of these 1MG Tafil, as I had done a month or so ago, so I could compare them for myself and offer some feedback. I'll preface my comments by saying that I have very little, if any, tolerance to benzos, as I only use them at night every once in a while as needed when I'm having trouble sleeping.

In any event, I compared what I received to your photos, and to the ones I received 4 - 6 weeks ago, and I found them to be essentially identical to those previously received in terms of effectiveness. I don't know what a typical reaction would be to 1MG of Tafil for an infrequent user with no tolerance, but they put me to sleep about an hour after taking 1MG. Didn't knock me on my a** or cause me to sleep for 48 hours or anything like that, but there was a noticeable effect. Another barometer I use in judging benzos is the onset of middle of the night munchies, where I wake up after 3 or 4 hours and feel the need to smash an extra large bowl of Captain Crunch. That never happens unless I take benzos, for whatever reason. I know that's less than scientific, but for me, it's a pretty fair measure of benzo legitimacy.

Additionally, I compared what I received to your photos, and we received the same batch number per the blister pack markings. Again, that doesn't prove anything per se, but I thought it was worth noting. I think that Hooter1 had also posted something about receiving an order from the same batch number, and that he found them legitimate but weak as compared to the same product obtained elsewhere. Also, speaking of the blister packs and reduced potency, I noticed as I was removing the pills from the blister pack that the paper backing was tougher than usual to penetrate with the pills. It had a seemingly thicker, or rather, denser, feel to it, and was more difficult to tear than one would expect. Given how it felt to the touch (the blister pack backing), my first thought was that they had been exposed to a high humidity environment. I've purchased the contents of storage units at auction in the past, and have found a number of books, magazines and other paper publications that had been stored in non-temperature controlled conditions for extended periods of time, and these blister pack backs reminded me of the feel of the paper items found in the storage units.

I also noticed that this batch seems to have expired on May 14th, so there's the age issue as well. When the age issue is considered along with the possible impact of less than ideal storage conditions, it starts to make a bit more sense in terms of reduced potency. After considering all of the potential factors at play, along with A and R's impeccable record and typical willingness to replace illegitimate product when it enters the supply chain, my instincts tell me that they are in fact real, but of diminished quality for one or more of the reasons cited. Should that change how you feel about the product you received? Certainly not. Do you have reason to be unhappy with the transaction and the handling of your complaint? Certainly, I probably would be unhappy as well if the product didn't do the job as intended and expected. I would, however, stop short of labeling them as "bunk", if only because of the connotations that term has in this industry. Again, I'm no benzo expert by any stretch, and it may well be that 1MG of Tafil should knock me out like a left-right combination from Mike Tyson. Robin Hood can speak better to that than I can, and given that Hooter received an order from this batch number and vendor, I would defer to his judgment as well, but again, and speaking only for myself, what I received did the job as intended and expected of a 1MG dose, for whatever that's worth from a benzo amateur.

Oh yes, and I should also note that I received them from R, not A, although that's inconsequential to the analysis. Sorry about the negative experience Mike. Hopefully they'll get a better quality stock soon. R did tell me that there have been some past quality issues with their alps, although to the best of his knowledge, they had been resolved quite some time ago.

Have a great weekend.....

 
Unfortunately, I don't think we're going to arrive at a definitive conclusion on this particular issue. I placed another partial order of these 1MG Tafil, as I had done a month or so ago, so I could compare them for myself and offer some feedback. I'll preface my comments by saying that I have very little, if any, tolerance to benzos, as I only use them at night every once in a while as needed when I'm having trouble sleeping.

In any event, I compared what I received to your photos, and to the ones I received 4 - 6 weeks ago, and I found them to be essentially identical to those previously received in terms of effectiveness. I don't know what a typical reaction would be to 1MG of Tafil for an infrequent user with no tolerance, but they put me to sleep about an hour after taking 1MG. Didn't knock me on my a** or cause me to sleep for 48 hours or anything like that, but there was a noticeable effect. Another barometer I use in judging benzos is the onset of middle of the night munchies, where I wake up after 3 or 4 hours and feel the need to smash an extra large bowl of Captain Crunch. That never happens unless I take benzos, for whatever reason. I know that's less than scientific, but for me, it's a pretty fair measure of benzo legitimacy.

Additionally, I compared what I received to your photos, and we received the same batch number per the blister pack markings. Again, that doesn't prove anything per se, but I thought it was worth noting. I think that Hooter1 had also posted something about receiving an order from the same batch number, and that he found them legitimate but weak as compared to the same product obtained elsewhere. Also, speaking of the blister packs and reduced potency, I noticed as I was removing the pills from the blister pack that the paper backing was tougher than usual to penetrate with the pills. It had a seemingly thicker, or rather, denser, feel to it, and was more difficult to tear than one would expect. Given how it felt to the touch (the blister pack backing), my first thought was that they had been exposed to a high humidity environment. I've purchased the contents of storage units at auction in the past, and have found a number of books, magazines and other paper publications that had been stored in non-temperature controlled conditions for extended periods of time, and these blister pack backs reminded me of the feel of the paper items found in the storage units.

I also noticed that this batch seems to have expired on May 14th, so there's the age issue as well. When the age issue is considered along with the possible impact of less than ideal storage conditions, it starts to make a bit more sense in terms of reduced potency. After considering all of the potential factors at play, along with A and R's impeccable record and typical willingness to replace illegitimate product when it enters the supply chain, my instincts tell me that they are in fact real, but of diminished quality for one or more of the reasons cited. Should that change how you feel about the product you received? Certainly not. Do you have reason to be unhappy with the transaction and the handling of your complaint? Certainly, I probably would be unhappy as well if the product didn't do the job as intended and expected. I would, however, stop short of labeling them as "bunk", if only because of the connotations that term has in this industry. Again, I'm no benzo expert by any stretch, and it may well be that 1MG of Tafil should knock me out like a left-right combination from Mike Tyson. Robin Hood can speak better to that than I can, and given that Hooter received an order from this batch number and vendor, I would defer to his judgment as well, but again, and speaking only for myself, what I received did the job as intended and expected of a 1MG dose, for whatever that's worth from a benzo amateur.

Oh yes, and I should also note that I received them from R, not A, although that's inconsequential to the analysis. Sorry about the negative experience Mike. Hopefully they'll get a better quality stock soon. R did tell me that there have been some past quality issues with their alps, although to the best of his knowledge, they had been resolved quite some time ago.

Have a great weekend.....
Pretty heavy benzo user myself & I literally LAUGHED OUT LOUD with the middle of the night munchies thing (happens every-night) just as you described. That's how I know if mine are of good quality, on top of the euphoria, and anxious free days.

 
Just FYI - I tried R out for the first time last week and things went just fine. I don't know if I count as being "new" since my main go-to has been A for as long as I can recall. But R answered me quickly and efficiently and I was happy with the results.
I'm not sure what's up with A but usually I always receive a response within hours and 36 hrs at the most...I don't want to freak anybody out but it's been 4 days now and no response...I'm a VERY loyal and bulky guy you could say. I'm NOT saying she is scamming but she's slowing down for sure.

Anybody else experience this?

 
It's summer as You stated the heat, humidity all can play a huge factor in meds. potency I'm sure everyone knows this. Opiated-

 
Just a quick update. Catching up so to speak, as I haven't been at a location to post much the last week or so.

My last several orders have been top shelf. On 2 of them I've needed additional time -past her normal cut off time- to get payment in, and she has accommodated me without issue, sending orders same day even tho I missed cut off time. Orders were seamless: sent order, paid, received. Everything accounted for and quality was great.

My orders have been the same forever, no issues on quality for a very long time. I do always specify brand I wish to receive, "please send xxx or zzz brand". I think that clarification is very important when you adamantly want one and not the other.

Also, a very big Happy Fathers Day to all the daddy's out there. I sure miss my daddy! He flew the bounds of this earth 4 years ago (next week), after sticking around for over 97 years!! He was the most awesome dad a girl could have had!

Happy weekend - hope it's enjoyed by all.

FG

 
No offence but you guys must be made of Money to pay some of these prices,  if he would drop the prices some he would make twice as much by getting twice as many customers.   am I the only one who thinks this or are the prices high to anyone else as well??  If I am wrong or cheap, then thats alright, just seems high to me!  This is mot for this MEX/SY vendor but they get thede things for pennies on the dollar for what they sell them for, so why not make the prices more affordable, so they can get a whole new wave of customers, but I guess if someone is willing to pay what they ask, then they can charge what they want I guess.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
@topshopslanger:

No offense taken. No, sadly enough, I haven't won Powerball, so I'm not "made of money". And I agree, as do all of us, the price is high! The thing is, it's simple economics - supply and demand. No need to explain that one. If I could get what I need somewhere else, for some significant amount less, with comparative confidence of receipt/ product quality, I would. Absolutely no question. But I can't.

At least I have a confidence right now that I'll receive...and that my risk of loss, comparatively speaking, is low.

FG

 
  • Like
Reactions: _X_
the think is there demand would skyrocket if they sold they at a decent markup instead of a 1500% markup.  In Mexico the 60 count jars of bars are $6.00 and $8 name brand, now if they sold $60 for $60 generic and $60 for $100 namebrand, they would have so many customers they would have trouble counting there money they would make so much, and the pain meds prices they can charge whatever cause noone else offers them so if they wanted $50 for a Roxi they could get t, and people would pay it!+  They just need to look at there marketing a little better.  More $ is not always better, make the prices a little lower and get thousands of New customers.  Ok thats my rant for today, now you can rip it apart!  LOL

 
the think is there demand would skyrocket if they sold they at a decent markup instead of a 1500% markup. In Mexico the 60 count jars of bars are $6.00 and $8 name brand, now if they sold $60 for $60 generic and $60 for $100 namebrand, they would have so many customers they would have trouble counting there money they would make so much, and the pain meds prices they can charge whatever cause noone else offers them so if they wanted $50 for a Roxi they could get t, and people would pay it!+ They just need to look at there marketing a little better. More $ is not always better, make the prices a little lower and get thousands of New customers. Ok thats my rant for today, now you can rip it apart! LOL
The flaw in this analysis is that it contemplates raw demand only while presuming all other elements to be static. You assume that supply is unlimited, or at least that it exists in excess at present. If no additional product is available to sell beyond the present supply levels, lowering prices to increase demand would simply create supply scarcity and reduce revenue.

On the other side of the coin, let's assume that additional supply is available, twice as much in fact. If they were to cut their prices by 50% to attract twice the present level of order volume, they would create no additional revenue, but have twice the orders to process and ship to yield the revenue they currently produce. That would only serve to dramatically reduce efficiency.

While most of us are not in fact "made of money", and would prefer to pay less, the reality is that certainty of delivery and product quality comes at a steep price in markets such as these, and with high demand, scarce products such as those we're discussing. As much as I'd love for your theory to be correct, it simply does not hold water from a pricing dynamic theory perspective, and unfortunately, prices for these products will not be going anywhere but up in the future.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Who says we are not made of money? This is whatI really look like.



 
Last edited by a moderator:
Drugbuyersguide Shoutbox
  1. LatsDoodis @ LatsDoodis: @SeaDonkey I think everyone deserves a second chance. I worked all night so eclipsing my life away… I do love stargazing and a telescope is high on my list of things to do when I’m high!
  2. iamgroot @ iamgroot: replied you already
  3. iamgroot @ iamgroot: are you talking about me? lol
  4. Diz-E @ Diz-E: @ I am Groot--I emailed ya bro, Diz-E
  5. SeaDonkey @ SeaDonkey: @LatsDoodis by tonight I meant like 16 hours from now, so you still have a chance!
  6. LatsDoodis @ LatsDoodis: @SeaDonkey ooh, I just got home, too, but Iit was raining here all of a sudden! How was it?
  7. SeaDonkey @ SeaDonkey: Anyone else gonna watch the lunar eclipse tonight
  8. S @ scarred14: @RussianRambo who did?
  9. xenxra @ xenxra: what the fudge
  10. R @ RussianRambo: he set up a controlled delivery on 2 people
  11. R @ RussianRambo: Slaughter AKA Slaughterhouse is no good anymore
  12. R @ RussianRambo: coolchems no good
  13. hiTillidie @ hiTillidie: Just yankin your lobe jason...once paid you should have privleges.
  14. hiTillidie @ hiTillidie: You gotta buy vendor coupons first...
  15. J @ jason1974: How do i access approved vendors now that i am a member?
  16. xenxra @ xenxra: @jason1974 every single time someone pops up with that handle, they're a scammer. my browser gives me a security warning for their site.
  17. hiTillidie @ hiTillidie: Coolchems is no good
  18. hiTillidie @ hiTillidie: Xenxra yeah fir sure.pigpredictable
  19. J @ jason1974: Can anybody vouch for Coolchems.com?
  20. J @ jason1974: Can anybody vouch for Coolchems.com?
Back
Top